Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kamilla Rakhimova vs Susan Bandecchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rakhimova vs Bandecchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Kamilla Rakhimova vs Susan Bandecchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rakhimova 0 - 0 Bandecchi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rakhimova has won 46.21% of points on their second serve, while Bandecchi has won 47.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rakhimova, in recent form, has won 57.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bandecchi has won 57.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.19% and 41.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rakhimova has saved 51.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bandecchi has saved 59.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rakhimova has won 47.27% of matches played (W/L 26/ 29), with Bandecchi winning 51.61% (W/L 32/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rakhimova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 40/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Bandecchi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Rakhimova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 13/ 7), where as Bandecchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.83% of matches (W/L 28/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rakhimova has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.53 while Bandecchi has played against players with an average rank of 364.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rakhimova has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bandecchi has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rakhimova has converted 45.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bandecchi has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
87
Rank
65
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
344
Rank
164
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
59% (194-136)
Career Total W/L
58% (263-194)
45% (14-17)
YTD W/L
57% (16-12)
$790,771
Career Prize Money
$93,621
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kamilla Rakhimova | Susan Bandecchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (14/17) | 57% (16/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (29/38) | 53% (36/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (296/342) | 53% (331/295) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 63% (12/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 37 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.46 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 146 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:25 | 1:54:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 157.26 | 428.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1204/2154) | 70% (1428/2040) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (730/1204) | 60% (854/1428) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (439/950) | 48% (294/612) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (106/235) | 47% (124/263) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (900/2093) | 47% (944/1994) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 57% (16/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (12/29) | 56% (15/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 62% (8/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (16/1) | 21% (14/3) |
Kamilla Rakhimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
57 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Camilla Rosatello
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve %
36%
(
5 of
14)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
11
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Taylor Townsend
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
10
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Daria Saville
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Martina Trevisan
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Susan Bandecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Susan Bandecchi
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
21%
(
6 of
29)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
72%
(
86 of
119)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
109
|
1-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Elvina Kalieva
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Solana Sierra
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Anna Ureke
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Susan Bandecchi
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tatiana Pieri
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Susan Bandecchi
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Lisa Pigato
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Rakhimova Vs Bandecchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
